Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Nathalie Lieven QC and Mr Shahram Taghavi (instructed by Charles Russell LLP) for the Claimant Mr Jonathan Auburn (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 20th March 2013 ____________________
Could the claimant have circumvented requirement (h) by relying on Rule 2 or making an "Outside the Rules" application?
From this it must further be concluded that the Secretary of State considers that requirement (h)(i) is Article 8 compliant per se.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.