Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             The appellant appeals with permission against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Farrelly, promulgated on 22 October 2023, dismissing his appeal against the decision of the Secretary of State made on 2 December 2022 to refuse his protection and human rights claim.
             The Secretary of State did not accept that the appellant was at risk either on account of the incidents in Vietnam or that he was at risk of being re-trafficked by those who had trafficked him to the United Kingdom, to whom he says he still has a debt; or, that he was at risk in more a generic sense of being re-trafficked, as a person in a vulnerable situation.
             Turning next to the issue of re-trafficking, the judge set out his findings, such as they are, at paragraphs 33 and 34. The judge said:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.