Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
            FtT Judge Dineen dismissed the appellant's appeal by a decision dated 2 February 2024.
            FtT Judge Bartlett refused permission to appeal to the UT. By an application dated 8 April 2024, the appellant sought permission from the UT on 8 grounds, set out at length, which may be summarised as follows.
            Ground 1 is that the assessment at [22 - 26] of EX1(b) and article 8 proportionality is inadequate, inaccurate, and makes no broad evaluative assessment. The factual error alleged is that the Judge thought the appellant had leave to remain until the end of his wife's studies in October 2024, whereas her studies were not mentioned in the evidence, and his leave had been curtailed to expire on 4 August 2023.
            Ground 2 is absence of an assessment of family life.
            Ground 3 is absence of an assessment of (i) the appellant's mental health, as set out in his statement and a letter from The London Road Medical Centre (ii) the stress on his wife of proposed IVF treatment and (iii) the fact that his wife is not going to Nigeria.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.