Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
       The appellant appeals, with permission, against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal dismissing her appeal against the respondent's decision to refuse her application for an EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) Family Permit.
       The appellant is a national of Pakistan born on 1 January 1957. She applied on 20 December 2021 for an EUSS Family Permit as the family member of a relevant EEA citizen, namely her grandson, the sponsor, Tasawar Mehmood Hanif, a Spanish national. Her application was refused on 24 May 2022 on the grounds that she had failed to provide evidence to prove that she was dependent upon the relevant EEA national sponsor and that she therefore failed to meet the eligibility requirements for an EUSS family permit as a dependent grandparent.
       The appellant sought, and was granted, permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on the grounds that the judge had failed to consider the bundle of documentary evidence which had been emailed to the Tribunal on 21 June 2022. A copy of the email of 21 June 2022 and the accompanying documentary evidence was produced with the IAFT-4 form applying for permission to appeal.
       There was therefore no appearance on behalf of the appellant at the hearing. Mr Tan appeared for the respondent.
       The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error on a point of law. The decision is set aside.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.