Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr Barnfield, Counsel, instructed by Cartwright King Solicitors
The appellant is a citizen of Pakistan. The appellant entered the United Kingdom as a Tier 1 (Post study) migrant on December 27, 2012 with entry clearance until March 6, 2014. On March 4, 2014 he applied for a variation of his leave to remain but the respondent refused this application on March 19, 2014 and at the same time a decision was taken to remove him under section 47 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006.
The appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal under Section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 on April 4, 2014.
On June 19, 2014 Judge of the First Tier Tribunal Heynes (hereinafter referred to as the �FtTJ�) heard the appeal and in determination promulgated on June 24, 2014 he refused the appeal.
The appellant lodged grounds of appeal on July 1, 2014 and on November 6, 2014 Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Landes refused permission to appeal finding there was no arguable error in law. Grounds of appeal were renewed to the Upper Tribunal and expanded upon and Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Mandalia found there was an arguable error in law in respect of two of the new grounds of appeal. Permission to appeal was restricted to these two grounds.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.