Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
The Secretary of State for the Home Department brings this appeal but in order to avoid confusion the parties are referred to as they were in the First-tier Tribunal. This is an appeal by the Secretary of State against a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judges Morris and Chambers promulgated on 12 February 2015 which allowed the Appellant's appeal under the Immigration Rules.
On 7 April 2014 the Appellant applied for entry clearance to the United Kingdom under Appendix FM as the fianc� of Ms Sara Jabeen a British Citizen.
On 24 April 2014 the Secretary of State refused the Appellant's application. The refusal letter gave only one reason that the Appellant did not meet the relationship requirements of Appendix FM in that there was insufficient evidence of a genuine and subsisting relationship or that they intended to live together permanently (E-ECP 2.6 and 2.10)
The Appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal. First-tier Tribunal Judge Chambers and Morris ("the Judges") allowed the appeal against the Respondent's decision on the basis of the documentary evidence and the oral evidence of Ms Jabeen. The Judges found :
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.