Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Ralph Marham (instructed by Covent Garden Family Law) for the Applicant Ms Pauline Lewis (instructed by Malik Legal Solutions.) for the 1st Respondent Mr Jamie Niven-Phillips (instructed by Cafcass) for the 2nd-5th Respondents Hearing date: 25th January 2024 Judgment: 1st February 2024 ____________________
"to secure the prompt return of children wrongfully removed to or retained in any Contracting State �."
"a) it is in breach of rights of custody attributed to a person, an institution or any other body, either jointly or alone, under the law of the State in which the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention; and b) at the time of removal or retention those rights were actually exercised, either jointly or alone, or would have been so exercised but for the removal or retention;
"The Convention shall apply to any child who was habitually resident in a Contracting State immediately before any breach of custody or access rights."
"Where a child has been wrongfully removed or retained in terms of Article 3 and, at the date of the commencement of the proceedings before the judicial or administrative authority of the Contracting State where the child is, a period of less than one year has elapsed from the date of the wrongful removal or retention, the authority concerned shall order the return of the child forthwith.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.