Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[3] He appealed against that decision claiming to be a refugee whose removal from the United Kingdom would be a breach of the United Kingdom 's obligations under the 1951 Geneva Convention and the European Convention of Human Rights. He also claimed international protection in terms of the Refugee or Persons in Need of International Protection (Qualification) Regulations 2006.
[8] The complaint that the immigration judge failed to make findings in fact which entitled her to find against the applicant, is misconceived. What she did was to make it clear what evidence was lacking, thus indicating that she was unable to make the findings in fact which were necessary to enable the applicant to succeed. She cannot be criticised for failing to make findings in fact where there was no evidence.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.