Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Rivett, counsel, instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor to HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents
This is an appeal against assessments raised by the Respondents (� HMRC �) for VAT periods 09/05, 12/05, 03/06, 06/06, 09/06, 12/06, 03/07, 06/07 and 09/07.� The original amounts in the assessment for the first four of these periods have already been revised by HMRC.� At the hearing of this appeal it was common ground that the appeal now concerns a single issue, which was formulated in the Appellant�s skeleton argument as follows :
Did certain of the Appellant�s customers who received supplies of foreign exchange and money remittance services belong outside the United Kingdom for the purposes of s.9(3) of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (�VATA 1994�) and Article 56 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (the �Principal VAT Directive�) (previously article 9(2)(e) of Council Directive 77/388/EEC (the �Sixth Directive�)) with the consequence that input tax attributable to such supplies is available for credit under s.26 VATA 1994?
Section 31 VATA provides that � A supply of goods or services is an exempt supply if it is of a description for the time being specified in Schedule 9 ... �
Schedule 9 VATA, at Group 5, item 1 specifies � The issue, transfer or receipt of, or any dealing with, money, any security for money or any note or order for the payment of money �.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.