Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Daniel Stilitz QC and Hannah Slarks (instructed by Ward Hadaway) for the Claimant Monica Carss-Frisk QC and Jane Collier (instructed by Trowers and Hamlins LLPTrowers and Hamlins) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 15 - 16 January 2020 ____________________
(b) reached conclusions on risk, governance, financial viability and growth that were irrational;
(d) unlawfully departed from its own policy on the grading of financial viability; and
(e) took a decision that was disproportionate, in breach of its statutory duties.
Mr Stilitz QC, for Inclusion, described this as a 'clean bill of health' and a 'relaxed recognition' that Inclusion was compliant with the Standard.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.