Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Barry Singleton QC and Deepak Nagpal (instructed by Manches LLP) for the Applicant former wife Lucy Stone QC and Sarah Phipps (instructed by Alexiou Fisher Philipps) for the Respondent former husband Hearing dates: 27th to 30th April, 6th May and 1st October 2009 ____________________
(b) Meanwhile in October and November 2006 the company paid H �1.1M gross in respect of outstanding preference share dividends. After tax this would leave him with about �670,000.
(c) On 19th October 2006 H redeemed the �300,000 mortgage on the former matrimonial home, two months ahead of the ordained timetable.
(e) He then paid W the whole of the �1.1M lump sum, as to �900,000 of it 13 months ahead of schedule.
(f) Between December 2006 and May 2007 the company (partly in its own right and partly in joint venture with another company) achieved a number of very significant successes in securing contracts, in marked contrast to the lengthy prior history of failed bids referred to in the judgment.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.