Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the appellant�s appeal is dismissed.
The appellant was represented by Mr J Kennedy, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Murphy & McManus, Solicitors.
The respondent was represented by Mr P McAteer, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by the Crown Solicitor�s Office.
1.1���� This is an appeal brought by the appellant under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 (�NMWA�).� The respondent issued to the appellant a Notice, pursuant to Section 19 of the NMWA of an underpayment in the sum of �4,956.20 in relation to the payments made by the appellant to Ms Aine Cox together with Notice of Penalty in the sum of �2,653.50.
1.2���� It was not necessary for the tribunal to consider further, in light of its decision, the amount of the said underpayment and penalty.� It was further agreed by the appellant�s representative that, if the appeal was dismissed, the said underpayment and penalty set out in the Notice would be payable by the appellant.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.