Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              The Appellant appealed against First-tier Tribunal Judge Raymond's decision, promulgated on 28 June 2023, to dismiss the Appellant's appeal against a decision of the Respondent refusing him leave to remain on human rights grounds.
              In extreme summary outline, the Appellant said that he was entitled to leave to remain because he had had a long-lasting relationship with an EEA national and although that relationship was now over it had lasted long enough for him to have established a right to remain. The Respondent did not agree.
              It was said that Judge Raymond had made numerous errors of law and analysed the evidence in a manner which gave rise to procedural unfairness.
              In addition, it was said that the Judge had erred in law in approaching this matter as if there was said to have been a sham marriage whereas in fact the Respondent had never raised the issue of a marriage of convenience or a sham marriage.
              It is clear that the issue being addressed by the parties before the Judge was the question of whether or not there was a durable relationship between the Appellant and his ex-partner and particularly whether or not it had continued after 2015, when the matter had been addressed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Higgins in relation to a different application made by this Appellant, and continued thereafter to 2020.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.