UI2024000151

Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, [the appellant] ( and/or any member of his family, expert, witness or other person the Tribunal considers should not be identified ) is granted anonymity.

No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant ( and/or other person ). Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .

              Further to a previous error of law hearing on 22 nd February 2024, I issued a decision finding that a material error of law had been established in the decision and reasons given by the First-tier Tribunal, promulgated on 15 th November 2023, in respect of the assessment made by the First-tier Tribunal of the very significant obstacles faced by the Appellant on return to Bangladesh, arising from his mental health issues (that error of law decision is appended to this decision).

              Accordingly, I set aside the decision solely in respect of the First-tier Tribunal's discrete finding on very significant obstacles under paragraph 276ADE(1)(vi) and directed that the matter be relisted for remaking before any judge of this Tribunal. By chance this matter came before me once more on the above date. I proceeded to hear this matter in respect of that one remaining issue in order to complete the assessment of the Appellant's human rights appeal.

              I have before me the following documentation: