Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
       The Appellant shall be referred to within the determination as HS with any reference to his full name in the medical reports and other evidence being replaced by these letters.
       The Appellant failed to attend the hearing. Mr Vokes did not express surprise, indicating that attempts had been made to arrange for an updated medical report in relation to the Appellant's mental health, but that he refused to cooperate claiming there was nothing wrong with him. It was agreed in the circumstances that the appeal can proceed by way of submissions only, which were made initially by Mr Lawson who was followed by Mr Vokes.
       The matter comes before us to remake decision and either allow or dismiss the appeal.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.