Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and the respondent was in breach of his duty to give the claimant a written statement of particulars of employment when proceedings were commenced. The claimant is awarded compensation in the sum of £5,550.00.
The claimant was represented by Ms Tremlett, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by P Vernon & Co Solicitors.
The respondent was represented by Mr Martin O'Brien, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by JPH Solicitors.
The claimant in her claim complained that she had been unfairly dismissed for alleged defamation and accusing a member of the management team of lying following her giving to the respondent information about another employee which she thought was in the respondent's best interests. The claimant stated her feeling that the reason for her dismissal was manufactured as an excuse to get rid of her and belief that the real reason was the respondent did not like how she stood up for the rights of cleaners.
(2) Did the respondent believe that the claimant was guilty of the misconduct alleged.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.