Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity, because this appeal involves a minor.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             This appeal comes back before me following a hearing on 20 October 2023 following which I decided that the First-tier Tribunal ("FtT") erred in law in allowing this appellant's appeal against the respondent's decision of 4 November 2019 to refuse his human rights claim, that claim having been made in the context of a decision to make a deportation order.
             As I said in my earlier, error of law decision, the decision to deport the appellant arises from his convictions for two offences of converting or transferring criminal property for which he was sentenced on 30 November 2017 to six years' imprisonment for each offence to run concurrently.
             The appellant has a daughter, K, born in 2010, who is a British citizen. The appellant's wife, K's mother, was involved in the same offending as that of the appellant. She received a sentence of 9 months' imprisonment suspended for 18 months. She has leave to remain until 20 June 2024.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.