Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[1] This is an action of damages for personal injuries based on a Closed Record, No.21 of process. The parties agreed quantum. The only disputed issues in the case related to the liability, if any, of the defenders and the issue of contributory negligence of the pursuer.
[2] The averments of fact which are admitted and the averments which are in dispute are to be found in Article 4 and Answer 4 of the Closed Record.
[3] In Article 6, the crave of the pursuer is based on multiple legal grounds. These grounds were restricted prior to the proof. The grounds on which counsel for the pursuer relied were founded on Regulations 5(1), 12(1) and 12(3) of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 2003.
[4] The proof commenced on 1 March 2011 . I heard evidence and submissions over the following three days.
Moria Divertie, Supervisor of Catering at a caf� in the defenders' premises. She was not employed by the defenders.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.