Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr John Brisby QC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court ____________________
Paul Downes and Krista Lee (instructed by HBJ Gateley Wareing) for the Petitioner Charles Purle QC & James Barker (instructed by Browne Jacobson LLP) for the Respondents Matthew Collings (instructed by Barlow Lyde & Gilbert) representing Hacker Young Hearing dates : 1st,2nd,5th, 9th,14th & 16th December 2005 ____________________
The "A" Ordinary Shares held by Mr Millership carried enhanced voting rights for the purposes specified in Regulations 4.3 and 5 of the Articles of Association.
Each of the Petitioners paid �50,000 for their package of 400 shares in the Company.
The Individual Respondents' position - without prejudice to their contention that the First Valuation constitutes a certificate within the meaning of the Articles - is that the Second Valuation indisputably constitutes a certificate. This is not accepted by the Petitioners.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.