Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
These are the appeals of Mr Junaid Ali Shaikh, born 25 December 1984, Mr Imran Shariff, born 6 December 1986 and Mrs Sheerin Taj, born 22 July 1988. The First Appellant is a citizen of Pakistan. The Second and Third Appellants are citizens of India. The Second and Third Appellants are husband and wife.
On 6 th February 2014 the First and Second Appellants made a combined application for leave to remain in the United Kingdom as Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) Migrants under the points-based system and for biometric residence permits. The Third Appellant made application in line with her husband.
There was a preliminary matter. I was quite properly informed that the Third Appellant, Mrs Taj, had returned to India. All parties agreed that the effect of that, having regard to Section 104 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 Act was that the appeal was to be treated as abandoned in her case. The appeals in respect of the first and second Appellants, however, remain live.
The Appellants represented themselves and I have to say that they have done so commendably well. Their case notwithstanding the complexity of the determination produced in the First-tier Tribunal is, after their careful distillation of the essential facts really quite simple.
The letter from the Habib Bank in respect of Mr Shaikh makes plain that the bank account is with respect to his own funds. The letter from Habib Bank with respect to Mr Shariff makes plain that the funds are those of Mr Shaikh.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.