Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
      Permission to appeal in this matter was granted by Upper Tribunal Judge Pickup by a decision dated 2 November 2023. This decision helpfully sets out the background of the appeal and the issues raised so I shall quote it below in full:
The appellant, a national of Nigeria renews his application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Gillespie) promulgated 5.7.23 dismissing his appeal against the respondent's decision of 23.5.22 to refuse his EUSS application made on 24.5.21.
The respondent considered the claim to have been made as the dependent relative of a relevant EEA citizen, and refused for lack of evidence of that status. At the First-tier Tribunal appeal hearing it was contended that the application was in fact made on the basis that the appellant had a derivative right to reside, with a card issued in 2017, valid until 10.10.22.
For the reasons explained above, an arguable material error of law is disclosed by the grounds.
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside. I have remade the decision. The appellant's appeal against the decision of the Secretary of State dated 24 May 2021 is allowed.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.