Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment was handed down in private but the judge hereby gives leave for it to be reported.
The judgment is being distributed on the strict understanding that in any report no person other than the advocates or the solicitors instructing them (and other persons identified by name in the judgment itself) may be identified by name or location and that in particular the anonymity of the child and the adult members of her family must be strictly preserved.
Mr Charles Howard QC and Ms Madeleine Reardon (instructed by Withers LLP) for the applicant (respondent husband) Mr Timothy Scott QC (instructed by Mischcon de Reya) for the respondent (petitioner wife) Hearing date: 10 March 2006 ____________________
i) an application in Form A for a periodical payments order in favour of the wife and the discharge of his undertaking, in paragraph 8 of his undertakings as set out in District Judge MacGregor's order, to pay periodical payments;
ii) an appeal against District Judge MacGregor's order together with an application for permission to appeal out of time;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.