Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[1] These are appeals, at the instance of JL and EI, in terms of section 74 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, against a decision made by the sheriff at Dundee at a first diet in a case where the two appellants had been indicted on a charge of assault to injury and permanent disfigurement. The respective notes of appeal are in identical terms. The submissions made by Mr Alonzi, on behalf of the first appellant, and Mr McCluskey, on behalf of the second appellant, overlapped.
[3] On 28 February 2014 the sheriff dismissed the minute. He granted leave to appeal in terms of section 74(1) of the 1995 Act.
[5] The grounds upon which the appellants appealed to this court are set out in their respective notes of appeal as follows:
"It does not matter if, to be meaningful, the information requires to be processed in some way such as translation, decoding or electronic retrieval".
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.