Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant was represented by Mr L Brown of Elliott Duffy Garrett, Solicitors.
The respondent was represented by Mr J Coyle, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Messrs Babington & Croasdaile, Solicitors.
Paragraph 2 then sets out a number of activities that are specifically excluded from the definition none of which are relevant for present purposes.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.