Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellants Maqsood Bibi and Shabana Kousar were born respectively on 1 January 1941 and 1 January 1981. By decisions dated 16 September 2012, they were refused entry clearance to the United Kingdom as visitors. The appellants appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Sarsfield) which, in a determination promulgated on 1 August 2013, dismissed the appeal. The appellants now appeal, with permission, to the Upper Tribunal.
The grounds of appeal address individually each of the findings contained in paragraph 6 of the determination and also the conclusion in paragraph 7. The judge made no finding whether the evidence for the appellants was credible or reliable. The judge gave insufficient or no reasons to support his conclusion. These are arguable errors of law and permission to appeal is granted.
(a) The respondent accepted the sponsor can maintain and accommodate the appellants and pay the travel costs.
(b) The appellants are reliant on other family for their income according to the applications, but there was no supporting evidence of any amounts or regularity.
(c) Only on appeal was any reference made to rental income and there is no supporting evidence.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.