Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent : Ms Ofei-Kwatia, counsel (instructed by Victory at Law Solicitors)
For the sake of convenience, I shall refer to the appellant as the �entry clearance officer� and to the respondent as �the claimant.�
The claimant is a national of Ghana. His application for an entry clearance to visit the UK for four weeks was refused by the entry clearance officer on 3 rd July 2013.
The claimant stated that he intended to visit his wife in the UK. The entry clearance officer refused his application on the merits under paragraph 41(i), (ii), (vi) and (vii) of the Immigration Rules.
The entry clearance officer also considered his application pursuant to paragraph 320(3) of the rules. That was on the basis that the claimant failed to produce to the entry clearance officer a valid national passport or other document satisfactorily establishing his identity and nationality. He had previously been encountered by authorities and had given a different identity. Accordingly, the entry clearance officer could not be satisfied that he had presented a valid passport satisfactorily establishing his nationality and identity.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.