Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 8 February 2006 Before
T-SYSTEMS LTD (UKEAT/0633/05/LA) APPELLANT (1) MISS K RAJU (2) ALLIED WORLDWIDE LTD RESPONDENTS ALLIED WORLDWIDE LTD (UKEAT/0634/05/LA) APPELLANT (1) MISS K RAJU (2) T-SYSTEMS LTD RESPONDENTS
Complex Sex Discrimination Act 1975 case involving contract workers. Allowed by consent. It was not permissible to remit the case to the Employment Tribunal as the opportunity to put all arguments and evidence was available at the Employment Tribunal when all parties were represented and it would be to expose the Respondents to new claims for the first time.
It is accepted, therefore, that applying those authorities, the Tribunal decided a matter which was not in issue or, as Mr Knight puts it, that had not been put in the way suggested.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.