Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Hugh Southey QC (instructed by Liberty) for the Claimant James Eadie QC and David Blundell (instructed by The Treasury Solicitor) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 12-13 February 2013 ____________________
i) There has been a renewed emphasis on the need to avoid any restraint technique that could lead to positional asphyxia, particularly in the seated position.
ii) When the prior risk assessment carried out in the case of each person subject to a removal operation shows a high risk of 'C and R' being required, someone with medical training will be assigned to the removal.
iii) Although not officially "approved" or "accredited", G4S did adapt a number of the techniques used in such situations which were reviewed by NOMs and no concerns were raised.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.