Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ralph Marnham (instructed by WBW Solicitors LLP) for the Applicant Father Katie Chokowry (instructed by International Family Law Group LLP) for the Respondent Mother Hearing dates: 7 and 8 August 2023 ____________________
i) That at the material time of the retention (agreed to be 31 January 2023), A's habitual residence was not in Australia but was in England and Wales;
ii) A's return to Australia would expose him to a grave risk of physical or psychological harm, or otherwise place him in an intolerable situation as per Article 13(b) of the 1980 Hague Convention, as a consequence of:
iii) That, on the basis that the Article 13(b) exception is made out on one or other of the grounds identified above, the court should exercise its discretion not to return A to Australia.
The mother originally intimated that her case would also be based on acquiescence, but did not in the event pursue this.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.