Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr A Mackenzie (on 8 th January 2018) and Ms L Hooper (on 6 th July 2018), instructed by Legal Rights Partnership
For the Respondent: Ms A Fijiwala (on 8 th January 2018) and Mr T Melvin (on 6 th July 2018), Senior Home Office Presenting Officers
On 8 th January 2018, I found the First-tier Tribunal had erred in law in its decision for the following reasons and I set aside the decision to be remade:
(i) The respondent refused Ms Zadgai's human rights application for leave to remain based on her family and private life for reasons set out in a decision dated 24 February 2016. Her appeal was heard by First-tier Tribunal Judge Hawden-Beal who, for reasons set out in a decision promulgated on 20 April 2017, dismissed her appeal.
(ii) Ms Zadgai sought, and was granted permission to appeal because it was arguable:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.