Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The grounds acknowledge that �some of the documentation [required] had been submitted�. It was not clear whether twelve months of payslips and bank statements had been provided and it is asserted in the grounds that the judge had �not addressed the relevant evidence from prior to the date of application.�
Mrs Pettersen, for the respondent, made oral submissions which differed from the grounds of appeal. She recorded that the judge had accepted in evidence an HMRC tax return for the tax year April 2012 � April 2013 and a tax calculation both of which documents had been provided in July 2013 whereas the application for entry clearance had been made on 1 April 2013. She submitted that the judge should not have considered that evidence because it had not been supplied with the application itself.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.