Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
VALUE ADDED TAX � default surcharge � can VAT credit under s 80 Value Added Tax Act 1994 be set against VAT for earlier periods which has already been paid � no � is a mistaken overpayment of VAT a reasonable excuse for late payment of VAT in respect of a subsequent VAT period � no � appeal dismissed
Miss Olivia Donovan, Presenting Officer of HM Revenue & Customs for the Respondents
The appellant, K D Media Publishing Limited (�K D Media�) is a magazine publishing company.� It was set up in 2009 around the time of the global financial crisis.� Partly as a result of this, it has always had cashflow problems and has consistently been late in paying its VAT, incurring VAT default surcharges for most VAT periods.
In February 2017, K D Media discovered that it had paid too much VAT for the 11/15 VAT period.� HMRC accepted this, adjusted the VAT due for that period and also reduced the default surcharge for the 11/15 period as a result of the reduced VAT liability.
With the consent of both parties, on 13 June 2018 the Tribunal issued a decision which did not include summary or full findings of fact and reasons for the decision.� K D Media has now requested a decision containing full findings of fact and reasons for the decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.