Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellant appeals against a determination of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Oakley promulgated on 4 th June 2014.
The Appellant is a male citizen of Pakistan born 12 th March 1993 who on 22 nd February 2013 applied for further leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a Tier 4 (General) Student Migrant.
The application was refused on 17 th December 2013 the Respondent having considered paragraph 245ZX(d) with reference to paragraph 13 of Appendix C of the Immigration Rules. In giving reasons for refusal the Respondent contended that the Appellant needed to show that he was in possession of �7,700 for a consecutive 28 day period the end date of which must be no earlier than 31 days before the date of application. The Appellant relied upon his father�s bank statement, but the closing date in that statement was more than 31 days before the date of application.
In addition the Appellant had not submitted a letter from his father confirming that his funds may be used by the Appellant to study in the United Kingdom, and confirming the relationship between them.
The appeal was heard by Judge Oakley (the judge) on 28 th May 2014. The judge found that the Appellant had not submitted with his application the required specified documents to prove that he satisfied the requirements of paragraph 245ZX(d). The judge accepted that the Appellant had sent a letter to the Respondent dated 6 th March 2013, after his application, which contained further documents. The judge found that he could not take those further documents into account because they had not been submitted with the application.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.