Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr D Seddon (instructed by Farani Javid Taylor Solicitors) for the Claimant Mr Thomas Roe QC (instructed by the Treasury Solicitors) for the Defendant ____________________
(4) Whether the second application was invalid for non-payment of the specified fee
"The claimant did not seek to challenge the decision to reject his application as invalid."
Note 2 See Kapil Basnet v The Secretary of State for the Home Department, UT sitting in Edinburgh on 7 February 2012, [2012] UKUT 00113 (IAC), per Blake J, President at paragraph 22. [Back]
Note 5 This was admitted by the SSHD in paragraph 2 of the summary grounds of defence. [Back]
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.