Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Mr B Amunwa (Counsel instructed by Schneider Goldstein Immigration Law)
This is an appeal by the Secretary of State for the Home Department (for the Entry Clearance Officer) against a decision made by the First-�tier Tribunal (Judge Finch) (FTT) allowing the appeal of the Claimants against a refusal of their applications for entry clearance for a family visit, on human rights grounds under section 84 (1) (b) & (c) 2002 Act.
For the sake of convenience the parties will be referred to in this decision and reasons as -�the Entry Clearance officer (ECO) -� who is the appellant in this matter and to the -�Claimants.-�
The Claimants are related as grandmother and grandson, and are citizens of Bangladesh.
Permission was granted by Designated FtT Judge Zucker on 15 th April 2015 who found that it was arguable that although the FTT did not have the ECM Review( in breach of standard directions), it may have been misled by the Appellant-�s submission that no deception occurred. The proportionality assessment was arguably flawed in the circumstances.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.