Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
CASTLE WHARF DEVELOPMENTS LTD. GLEEDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD. FRANKLIN ELLIS ARCHITECTS LTD.
We think that should await the outcome of that trial when the cost's Judge will be in a better position to see what should await the outcome of that trial, when the cost's Judge will be in a better position to see what should be the costs thrown away. We should make clear that in relation to the contract issue we accept that it did not occupy much time, or argument, and we think therefore, that, looking at all the issues as between Castle Wharf and Jarvis, Castle Wharf was the substantial winner, and we therefore make no discount in respect of that issue.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.