Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
                  The appellant appeals a decision of the First-tier Tribunal. By the decision sent to the parties on 19 April 2024 First-tier Tribunal Judge Montgomery ("the Judge") refused the appellant's protection and human rights appeal.
                  The Judge issued an anonymity order. Neither representative requested that the order be set aside and I have decided to maintain the anonymity order. This is because the underlying claim involves international protection issues and I consider that at the present time the appellant's private life rights, protected by Article 8 ECHR, outweigh the public right to be informed that he is a party to these proceedings. The latter right is protected by Article 10 ECHR.
                  The anonymity order is detailed above.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.