Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Miss Kerry Bretherton (instructed by Linder Myers) for the Applicant Miss Amy Street (instructed by Irwin Mitchell) for the First Respondent Miss Gillian Irving QC and Mr David Mackley (instructed by the Local Authority's Solicitor's Department) for the Second Respondent Mr Neil Allen (instructed by Linder Myers) for the Third Respondent Hearing dates: 14, 19, 20, 25, 26, 27 January, 10 February and 8 March 2010 ____________________
ii) whether it is in his best interests to return to live with F or whether he should be cared for in a residential care home and if so which care home;
iii) what contact provision should be made for G and/or F if E does not return home;
iv) whether the local authority has unlawfully detained E in breach of Article 5 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and/or the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and/or Article 6 of the convention;
v) whether the local authority has interfered with E's right to a home and/or to family life under Article 8 of the convention;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.