Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Mr T Hussain, Counsel instructed by Patel & Bhatoa Solicitors
This is the Secretary of State�s appeal against the decision of Judge Ince made following a hearing at Bradford on 8 th September 2014.
The Appellant is a citizen of Pakistan. She applied to come to the UK as a spouse but was refused entry clearance on the grounds that the Entry Clearance Officer was not satisfied that she was in a genuine and subsisting relationship or that she could meet the financial requirements of the Rules.
By the time the matter came before the Judge the only issue was the financial one. The Judge found that the Sponsor was working as claimed and that he had two sources of income. He was a counter assistant at BBQ Hut and a production operative at Stafforce Personnel Limited. His combined income from both these sources was about �21,379 per year. He produced P60s for both jobs confirming the employment. He also produced wage slips from both employers and bank statements for the period from November 2012 to July 2013 plus an employment record schedule and a schedule of monthly earnings.
So far as the employment from BBQ Hut was concerned he was paid in cash which he used for day-to-day expenditure and support for himself and his wife.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.