Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Christopher Hames (Instructed by Brookman) for the Applicant The Respondent appeared in person Sheena Cassidy (Instructed by Revenue & Customs Prosecutions Office) for the Intervener Hearing date: 19 November 2008 ____________________
(1) This order does not prohibit the Alleged Offender from spending up to �250 per week towards his ordinary living expenses � But before spending any money the Alleged Offender must
ii) An order "pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rules 2005 Rule 57.8(2)(b) giving her permission to serve and file in these proceedings [i.e. the schedule 1 maintenance proceedings] any statements filed in Crown Court proceedings involving the father"
iii) An order "requiring the Prosecutor to reveal all action taken by the father and the Prosecutor pursuant to paragraph 8 of the Restraint Order".
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.