Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant entered the UK as a student on 26 September 2012. This leave expired on 30 January 2014 and he made an application to extend his leave on 28 January 2014. In a decision dated 31 March 2014 the SSHD refused to vary the appellant�s leave and the appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal.
This is a matter that has previously been considered by First-tier Tribunal Judge Smith having heard from the appellant at a hearing on 23 September 2014. The Judge dismissed the appellant�s appeal under the Immigration Rules and Article 8.
Permission to appeal against this decision was granted by Judge Scott Baker on 20 March 2015 on the basis that the Judge arguably failed to engage with available evidence from the appellant and Nottingham Business School
The matter now comes before me to determine whether or not the decision of the First-tier Tribunal contains a material error of law.
The appellant did not attend the hearing and was not represented. Mr McVeety asked me to dismiss the appeal.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.