Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Subject_1 Reparation Subject_2 Wrongous Sequestration Subject_3 Relevancy — Facts: Averments in an action of damages for wrongous sequestration which held irrelevant.
This is an action of damages for wrongful sequestration by a landlord. The defender pleaded that the action was irrelevant.
“It being admitted that the defender applied for and obtained the warrant of sequestration dated 10th August 1863, annexed to the petition, No. 10 of process, and that the said warrant was executed:
It being also admitted that the defender applied for, and obtained the relative warrant of sale, dated on or about 21st August 1863, and in virtue thereof sold by public roup the growing crop belonging to the defender on the said farm of Cubbox:
Whether the said warrants were wrongously applied for and executed, to the injury and damage of the pursuer?”
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.