Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Ms J Heybroek, counsel instructed by Kothala & Co, solicitors
This appeal came before me on 16 December 2015 as an error of law hearing, where I found that First tier Tribunal Judge Baldwin had materially erred in law and I adjourned the appeal to hear submissions in respect of Article 8 of ECHR. This decision is appended.
She submitted that, with regard to paragraph 297(i)(f) that there are suitable arrangements for their care and no issues in terms of accommodation or maintenance.
In response, Ms Heybroek submitted that, in relation to the medical evidence, this was described as degenerative. In respect of the issue of a
(i) the Sponsor fled China and claimed asylum in the United Kingdom. This application was unsuccessful. He was subsequently granted ILR under the provisions of the Legacy Programme;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.