Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 we make an order prohibiting the disclosure or publication of any matter likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Breach of this order can be punished as a contempt of court. We make this order because this is a protection case and there is an inherent risk that publicity could create a risk for the appellant in the event of his return and also because his personal vulnerability could attract people of ill-will in the United Kingdom.
This is an appeal against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal dismissing the appellant's appeal against the decision of the Secretary of State refusing him leave to remain on human rights grounds and refusing him international protection. The appellant is subject to a deportation order.
The appeal turns on the tension between the public interest in removing foreign criminals and the particular difficulties that this appellant would face in the event of his return to Somaliland on account of his poor health and personal limitations.
By way of introduction we paraphrase the opening paragraphs in the grounds for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.
This shows that the appellant was born in about 1984 (there is some inconsistency on the evidence) and he has significant learning difficulties. His IQ has been assessed at 55.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.