Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court
      The appellant, who was born on 1 st January 1952, appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) against the respondent's decision dated 28 July 2022. In that decision the respondent decided to refuse her application for humanitarian protection and human rights protection which was made on 9 February 2022.
      The appellant was granted anonymity pursuant to rule 13 of the First-Tier Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber Rules 2014 and there is no objection to that anonymity order continuing in force in the Upper Tribunal (UT). I therefore continue that anonymity direction.
      The appellant's appeal was heard on 8 March 2024 at Taylor House. Immigration Judge S George (the judge) dismissed her appeal on the basis she would be returned to a country, namely India, of which she found the appellant to be a national and there would not be a risk from the Taliban or of her not receiving medical treatment there. On 8 April 2024, the above decision was promulgated.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.