Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MR C JACOBS & MR A TEAR (instructed by White Ryland, London W12 8HA) appeared on behalf of the CLAIMANT MS C PATRY HOSKINS(instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) appeared on behalf of the DEFENDANT ____________________
In paragraph 28 the Immigration Judge found both the claimant and his wife to be credible witnesses and accepted their accounts in their entirety.
Although Mr Jacobs raised a number of grounds in his skeleton argument, by the conclusion of his submissions and those of Miss Patry Hoskins, on behalf of the defendant, there was a substantial amount of common ground to the following effect.
(1) a senior Immigration Judge could order reconsideration only if he thought that the Immigration Judge "may have made an error of law" (see section 103A of the Nationality and Immigration Act 2002 (as amended).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.