Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The applicant at this hearing is the Secretary of State for the Home Department. For ease of reference and continuity I will refer to her as the respondent.
The respondent notified the appellant of her decision to refuse to issue him with an EEA Residence Card and to revoke his existing Residence card on 16 December 2014. His appeal against that decision was allowed by First Tier Tribunal Judge GM Cox ("the Judge") following a hearing on 19 March 2015. This is an appeal against that decision.
First-Tier Tribunal Judge RA Cox granted permission to appeal (9 June 2015) on the ground that it is arguable that the Judge erred in misdirecting himself as to Regulation 10 (6) (c) and (b)(i) of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 ("the regulations") as the appellant had ceased employment on 30 September 2014 and there was no evidence to show that he had registered as a jobseeker with the relevant employment office.
(1) In these Regulations, "family member who has retained the right of residence" means, subject to paragraph (8), a person who satisfies the conditions in paragraph ... (5).
(a) is not an EEA national but would, if he were an EEA national, be a worker, a self-employed person or a self-sufficient person under regulation 6 ; or
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.