Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
In this appeal, the Secretary of State is the Appellant and Mr Ansar Abbas is the Respondent. For the sake of clarity however throughout this determination, I will refer to the Secretary of State as �the Respondent� and Mr Abbas as �the Appellant�, as they were before the First-tier Tribunal.
�In relation to the refusal under the Attributes heading the Respondent stated as follows:
� �You have not provided sufficient evidence with your application as specified under Appendix A of the Immigration Rules. Alongside your application you must provide a Third Party Declaration with the date of the declaration on a Legal Representative Letter which includes the third parties passport or national identity document with the issue and expiry dates and a Bank letter confirming the funds available.
You have provided a Third Party Declaration, a Legal Representative Letter and a Bank Letter. However, the Legal Representative Letter does not include the issue date and the expiry date of the national identity document.
The Secretary of State is not satisfied, therefore, that you qualify for the award of points in this area. The acceptable evidence as defined in the Immigration Rules must be provided in order for you to meet the criteria and be awarded points.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.