Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Richard Todd QC & Lily Mottahedan (instructed by Vardags Solicitors) for the Appellant The 1st Respondent appeared in person and was unrepresented Richard Harrison QC & Samantha Ridley (instructed by Lewis Silkin LLP) for the 2nd Respondents Hearing date : Tuesday 10th November 2015 ____________________
Attached to the Notice is a substantial document within which the husband seeks to reargue his case that permission to appeal should not be granted. The husband says: that there are factual errors in my judgment, that the court was grievously misled by those representing the wife at the oral application for permission to appeal and that the reasoning of Mr Justice Coleridge was clear and cogent. The husband underlines the devastating consequences of the litigation on the family and on the Charity.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.