Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
1.������ That the correct title of the first named respondent is Rainbow Garland Limited.
2.������ That an order should be made under Rule 49 of the tribunal�s Rules of Procedure so that any matter which is likely to lead to the identification of the claimant should be omitted from the Register and from this decision.� A restricted reporting order under Rule 50 was in force in this case prior to the issue of this decision.
3.������ That the first respondent is hereby ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of �658.80 in respect of outstanding holiday pay.
That the claimant was harassed by Bryan West, a director of the first respondent, on the grounds of his sexual orientation and was also subjected to discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation.
The first respondent is hereby ordered to pay to the claimant compensation in respect of that harassment in the sum of �15,000.00. �In addition, Bryan West is hereby ordered personally to pay to the claimant compensation in the sum of �5,000.00 in respect of his harassment of the claimant in the course of his employment.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.